Property Collateral Valuation in Bangladesh: The Need for a Bank-Led Oversight Framework Beyond Independent Valuers

Ensuring Transparency, Accountability and Risk-Based Valuation in Determining the True Value of Collateral

In the banking sector, property valuation is far more than a procedural requirement for loan disbursement; it is one of the most critical components of financial risk management. Particularly when land, buildings and commercial properties are used as collateral for bank loans, determining their actual market value plays a vital role in controlling credit risk. The acceptability of collateral against a loan, the appropriate Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio, and the potential recovery from the sale of collateral in the event of borrower default—all depend significantly on accurate and reliable valuation.

Against the backdrop of rising Non-Performing Loans (NPLs), weak credit discipline and governance deficiencies in Bangladesh's banking sector, it is time to reassess the country's property collateral valuation system. A property does not automatically become secure collateral simply because it has been assigned a high value on paper. Ownership rights, legal validity, possession, marketability and the ability to sell the property within a reasonable timeframe are equally important considerations.

This raises an important question: Should banks continue to rely primarily on reports prepared by external independent valuation firms, or should they establish a stronger bank-led collateral valuation framework supported by internal technical verification, oversight and accountability?

Limitations of the Existing Valuation Practices

For many years, commercial banks in Bangladesh have relied on independent professional valuers to determine the value of land, buildings and other assets offered as collateral against loans. Their technical expertise and professional experience contribute to maintaining objectivity in the valuation process.

However, risks may arise when banks accept valuation reports without conducting adequate internal scrutiny and verification. Limited access to verified market data, inconsistencies in valuation methodologies, complexities relating to land ownership and weaknesses in assessing actual marketability can affect the accuracy of property valuations.

In particular, when a property is overvalued, recovering the expected amount through its sale after a borrower defaults may become extremely difficult. This can expose banks to substantial financial losses.

Therefore, an independent valuation report should not be considered a substitute for a bank's own due diligence, technical review and credit risk assessment. Rather, it should serve as one of the key supporting documents in the decision-making process.

Bangladesh Bank's Regulatory Initiatives: An Important Foundation

Bangladesh Bank has already undertaken several important initiatives to improve professional standards and reliability in collateral valuation.

On November 28, 2023, Bangladesh Bank issued BRPD Circular No. 16, establishing guidelines for the enlistment of collateral valuation firms or companies under the relevant provisions of the Bank Company Act. The objective was to introduce a structured and transparent process for selecting valuation firms and enhance the credibility of valuation services.

Furthermore, Bangladesh Bank's publication, Prudential Regulation for Banks: Selected Issues (April 2024), highlights the importance of reliable collateral valuation in areas such as credit management, loan classification, provisioning, loan rescheduling and recovery operations.

However, merely enlisting valuation firms is not sufficient. Effective oversight is necessary to assess the quality of their work, professional accountability, potential conflicts of interest and the accuracy of valuation reports.

From Independent Valuation to Bank-Led Oversight

Establishing a bank-led collateral valuation framework does not mean diminishing the role of independent valuers. Rather, it means strengthening banks' internal accountability and oversight while preserving the professional independence of external valuation experts.

In this regard, every bank should have a clearly defined collateral valuation policy. An internal technical review mechanism should also be established to scrutinize external valuation reports.

In particular, three types of property values should be distinguished:

1. Market Value: The estimated price at which a property could be sold under normal market conditions.

2. Forced Sale Value: The estimated amount that could be realized if a property had to be sold within a limited timeframe or under special circumstances.

3. Prudential Collateral Value: The value of collateral considered acceptable by a bank in accordance with its risk management framework and prudent lending policies.

In addition, ownership rights, title deeds, mutation records, land records, possession, pending litigation and the legal eligibility of a property for mortgage must be thoroughly verified.

Ultimately, responsibility for accepting collateral and assessing the associated credit risk must remain with the bank's authorized decision-making authorities. It cannot be delegated entirely to external valuation firms.

The Need to Develop Internal Valuation Expertise

Banks may establish dedicated internal collateral valuation and review units under their risk management frameworks.

The key responsibilities of these units should include:

- Conducting technical reviews of external valuation reports.

- Arranging revaluation of high-value properties whenever necessary.

- Assisting relevant departments in verifying property ownership and legal validity.

- Monitoring market trends in the land and real estate sectors.

- Developing and maintaining a centralized collateral database.

- Identifying inconsistencies and unusual valuation practices.

These units should operate independently of loan marketing and business development activities. Their findings should also be submitted to senior management through the bank's risk management structure.

Qualifications and Experience of Independent Valuers

Professional qualifications and practical experience are essential for valuing properties, industrial machinery and financial assets. The eligibility criteria for valuers should take into account their academic backgrounds, specialized training and relevant professional experience.

The proposed qualifications and experience requirements may include the following:

1. Land and Buildings

- A bachelor's degree from a recognized university in Civil Engineering, Technical Education or a relevant discipline.

- A postgraduate degree in Civil Engineering, Architecture, Valuation or Urban Planning.

- A diploma in Civil Engineering, Architecture or Surveying recognized by the Bangladesh Technical Education Board (BTEB), along with at least five years of experience in valuation-related work.

- Professional qualifications meeting the prescribed requirements of valuation firms recognized by the relevant authorities.

- For graduates in general disciplines, at least five years of verifiable experience in valuation-related work.

2. Plant and Machinery

- A degree in Mechanical or Electrical Engineering from a recognized university.

- A bachelor's degree in Technical Education or a postgraduate qualification in a relevant discipline.

- A BTEB-recognized diploma in Mechanical or Electrical Engineering, together with at least five years of experience in valuation-related work.

- Specialized education and practical experience in the valuation of machinery and industrial assets.

3. Securities and Financial Assets

- Membership of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Bangladesh (ICAB).

- A bachelor's degree in a general discipline, followed by at least three years of relevant professional experience.

- An MBA or PGDBM degree with a specialization in Finance.

- Membership in relevant professional institutions and appropriate work experience.

It should be noted that these proposed qualifications and experience requirements must be aligned with the policies approved by the relevant authorities and recognized professional standards.

Risk-Based Revaluation and the Use of Technology

Property valuation should not be treated merely as a one-time formality at the time of loan approval. The market value, locational significance, infrastructure facilities and marketability of a property may change over time.

Therefore, a risk-based revaluation mechanism should be introduced, particularly for high-value properties, large loan exposures and high-risk or classified loans.

The use of modern technology can make the valuation process more transparent and effective. Relevant tools and technologies may include:

- A centralized digital collateral database.

- Geographic Information System (GIS) technology for verifying property locations and geographical information.

- Digital land surveying.

- Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) technology for accurate positioning and land measurement.

- Drone-based surveying and monitoring.

- A database of verified property transaction records.

However, these technologies can never replace the professional judgment of qualified valuers, physical site inspections or legal verification. Instead, reliable valuation can be achieved through an effective combination of technology and professional expertise.

Repayment Capacity, Not Collateral Alone, Should Be the Primary Consideration

The most important consideration in bank lending should be the borrower's ability to repay the loan. Collateral serves as a secondary source of security for loan recovery, not the primary basis for lending decisions.

Providing loans solely against high-value mortgaged properties can be risky if borrowers lack sufficient income, sustainable business cash flow and financial capacity to meet their repayment obligations.

The situation surrounding Non-Performing Loans in Bangladesh's banking sector raises serious questions about the consequences of weak credit assessment, inadequate supervision and governance deficiencies.

Furthermore, political changes, shifts in government policies, economic uncertainty and market volatility can significantly affect property values and their marketability.

Therefore, before approving a loan, banks must conduct an integrated assessment of the borrower's financial capacity, future business prospects, industry-specific risks, actual collateral value and potential recovery scenarios.

Recommendations: Ensuring Coordinated Responsibilities and Accountability

To strengthen the property collateral valuation system in Bangladesh's banking sector, a clear division of responsibilities is necessary among independent valuers, bank management, loan approval authorities, internal audit departments and Bangladesh Bank.

The respective responsibilities should include:

Independent Valuers: Prepare valuation reports with impartiality, professional integrity and accuracy.

Bank Management: Ensure verification of valuation reports, legal due diligence and necessary technical reviews.

Loan Approval Committees: Consider the borrower's repayment capacity and overall credit risk alongside the value of collateral.

Internal Audit Departments: Monitor compliance with valuation policies, internal control mechanisms and potential irregularities.

Bangladesh Bank: Strengthen regulatory oversight, professional accountability and valuation standards.

In addition, it is essential to establish uniform valuation standards, expand professional training opportunities and introduce transparent mechanisms to address valuation irregularities, conflicts of interest and professional negligence.

Conclusion: Good Governance in Valuation Is an Integral Part of Banking Governance

The future of property collateral valuation in Bangladesh depends on combining independent professional expertise with a bank-led, accountable and effective oversight framework.

Banks must move beyond the conventional practice of merely accepting external valuation reports and ensure their own technical verification, legal due diligence and continuous monitoring.

Independent valuers will continue to play an important role in determining the professional and impartial value of properties. However, the ultimate responsibility for prudent lending decisions, safeguarding depositors' funds and managing credit risks rests with the banks themselves.

Therefore, establishing transparency, professional standards, accountability and effective controls in collateral valuation is not merely a matter of financial security for individual banks; it is also an indispensable component of ensuring the stability and reform of Bangladesh's overall financial sector.

---

Author

Engineer Mohammad Anwar Hossain

MSc in Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)

Founder Member and Senior Vice President, BSVCFICA

Professional Valuation Engineer

Member: BES, IDEB, IEB, DUAA, BSGF, POBA, BANIPA, BSTQM, BLF, and other professional organizations.